Abortion Policy
MORALITY
Moral and Religious Standards and Differences
We must first begin with defining moral standards. I was brought up in a Christian Nationalist environment with strong moral convictions that were often applied to broader society. My early development took place in a setting where a particular ethical framework held significant sway. This wasn't an innate perspective for me but one that was strongly influenced. Over time, as I've explored different philosophical viewpoints, I've moved away from rigid moral beliefs toward a more open and accepting understanding of ethics. This represents a notable shift from my initial background. In fact, many within my previous communities disagree with my current ethical views.
Daniel Dennett argued that morality is free will. Previously, I would have dismissed this idea coming from an atheist because of my former evangelical view, but now I find myself in agreement. My past understanding of morality and ethics, shaped by an Evangelical Christian background, differs significantly from my current perspectives informed by a more universal and inclusive theological viewpoint.
One key example of where my personal values intersect with differing views is on sensitive topics like abortion. As a spiritual care provider professionally, I encounter individuals strongly opposed to abortion who choose to continue their pregnancy, even with significant life changes ahead. Simultaneously, I support patients in our hospital who decide to terminate their pregnancy due to various difficult circumstances. Holding a more flexible and understanding approach to morality allows me to respectfully engage with people holding different beliefs on this complex issue without personal conflict.
I maintain a personal standard for interacting with others, based on my core beliefs. A central tenet of my approach is a commitment to minimizing harm. This principle of harm reduction is grounded in my understanding of scripture and the teachings of Jesus to "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Suspending personal moral judgment and providing compassionate care that respects individual autonomy and dignity is particularly crucial when supporting individuals facing difficult decisions, such as abortion, which may conflict with their deeply held beliefs.
Understanding that morality is shaped by culture, religion, and personal experiences helps me grasp someone's ethics without forcing my own views on them, which avoids potential spiritual or emotional distress. Learning to value the varied and personal nature of morality makes me better at minimizing harm and offering truly kind and unbiased support, reflecting Jesus's true teaching to love others.
Addressing the Idea of Religious Sin in Abortion
Considering the complexities of the abortion debate requires compassion and justice. Understanding human suffering and individual circumstances is vital. We should examine the broader systemic injustices—like capitalism, dysfunctional family dynamics, and political oppression—that can lead individuals to seek abortion.
Decisions around pregnancy termination are often made in response to difficult circumstances and should be met with support rather than judgment. Recognizing the inherent dignity of each person, regardless of their choices, is key.
Accepting that the choice to end a pregnancy can arise from the need to navigate challenging circumstances within flawed human systems within our world and may offer a faith-based understanding of abortion as a justifiable option. It's important to consider that the reasons behind this decision often reflect a longing for well-being for both the individual and their community, rather than an intention to cause harm. This viewpoint encourages us to look beyond traditional judgments and explore the interconnected social factors that shape personal choices. Ultimately, a theology rooted in compassion invites us to support those in need, promoting fairness and empathy as we face difficult situations together.
Addressing Biblical Argument about Abortion
Biblical discussions around abortion are intricate. While the Bible lacks direct mentions of abortion, some passages are often used in religious and ethical arguments. These include Genesis 9:6 ("Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image"), Exodus 20:13 ("You shall not murder"), and Exodus 23:7b ("Do not kill the innocent and righteous"). These verses mainly touch on the general idea of murder and are largely based in Old Testament law.
10 While some religious groups invoke these Old Testament passages in support of anti-abortion policies, it’s essential to recognize that such interpretations can be selective and context-dependent. While the Bible speaks against murder at times, the application of these teachings to the topic of abortion necessitates a deeper understanding of the scriptural context and the ever-evolving moral landscape.
Various instances in the Old Testament illustrate circumstances where violence was condoned. Deuteronomy 20 discusses establishing armies to defeat enemies. Genesis 6 describes a flood due to human wickedness, causing widespread death. Genesis 19 recounts the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, a narrative sometimes misapplied in modern discussions about the LGBTQ+ community. Similarly, Joshua 6 describes the obliteration of Jericho, and 1 Samuel 15 details the command to annihilate the Amalekites, including non-combatants. Judges 14 reflects Samson's use of his strength to kill innocent men.
Attributing a universal condemnation of murder to Christian scripture oversimplifies a complex discussion that prompts consideration of how these texts apply to modern ethical issues. Analyzing the Bible necessitates both critical thinking and empathy, especially when addressing the moral and ethical consequences of diverse scriptural interpretations in today's society. It is important to consider the intended meaning alongside the literal interpretation as we navigate these significant ethical dilemmas.
Supporting Those Receiving Abortions
Supporting individuals facing difficult situations, including abortion, reflects a commitment to compassion and empathy. This decision is deeply personal and extends beyond the medical realm. It requires understanding and recognition that individuals making challenging choices deserve support.
Individuals likely do not hastily seek abortion clinic services due to the significant and evident social stigma. This stigma is often intensified by the unwelcoming atmosphere generated by some groups, including vocal protesters outside these clinics. Such interactions can foster a divisive mindset, further upsetting individuals already facing difficult situations.
Emphasizing honor and peace in our interactions, especially with those in vulnerable situations, offers a strong guide for conduct. We should avoid harming those in need of this medical care and always act with kindness. The concept that every person is inherently valuable and deserving of respect suggests that a compassionate and understanding approach is more appropriate than condemnation or judgment when considering the sensitive issue of abortion.
Engaging with the complexities of abortion requires empathy, understanding, and a willingness to support those facing difficult circumstances. Rather than judgment, offering compassion and recognizing the unique and challenging nature of each individual's situation is essential. This approach allows for a more supportive environment for those navigating these struggles.
From a progressive Christian viewpoint, the call to uphold the dignity of all human beings extends to abortion providers within the realm of healthcare. Acknowledging the significant role of healthcare professionals who support individuals facing complex and difficult decisions regarding unexpected or complicated pregnancies is key.
Compassion is central to many ethical frameworks, urging us to support individuals seeking reproductive healthcare and the professionals who provide this care. Abortion providers often encounter significant challenges and feelings of isolation. Acknowledging their inherent worth, similar to the patients they serve, aligns with principles of empathy and acceptance.
This mirrors the account of Zacchaeus in Luke 19:1-10, where Jesus shows compassion and acceptance toward a socially marginalized tax collector. Despite his status, Jesus acknowledged his value and invited him into community. This illustrates that compassion extends to everyone, encouraging us to offer the same grace to both patients and healthcare providers, reflecting a message of inclusivity and care.
A comprehensive and empathetic approach to reproductive healthcare acknowledges the interconnectedness of all individuals involved. Recognizing the importance of supporting those navigating complex reproductive decisions, a community focused on justice and empathy should foster an environment where patients and healthcare providers are treated with respect, dignity, and understanding. This commitment is foundational to fostering a healthcare environment that truly represents compassionate and ethical care.
Concerning The Aborted
As a parent of three, I deeply consider the significance of life, purpose, and the inherent value of each child. My children were born without complications and into fortunate circumstances, which makes me both grateful and aware of my responsibilities and privlege. I view my children as unique individuals with intrinsic worth within a larger context. This perspective extends to unborn children, who, regardless of their circumstances, are equally part of existence with their own meaning.
Every child, regardless of their circumstances at birth, possesses inherent value. Children born into adversity, entering a world marked by suffering and inequality, compel us to consider our responsibilities as members of society. While it is desirable for every child to experience a full life, many face difficult realities that limit their opportunities. These challenges do not diminish their fundamental worth; rather, they underscore the complexities of human existence.
Examining the societal structures that influence the circumstances in which children are born is crucial. In a world marked by widespread oppression, poverty, and abuse, we must consider the implications for those facing hardship. For some, the concept of respite may offer comfort for vulnerable lives destined for difficulty. This allows for a thoughtful consideration of abortion not solely as a termination but as a complex ethical issue aimed at preventing a child from a life of suffering.
Oppressive systems significantly influence our spiritual and communal experiences, as highlighted by thinkers like Gregory Ellison. Fear and pain inflicted by these structures can obscure the inherent potential within each life. Advocacy should broaden from solely focusing on abortion to actively challenging the systemic inequalities that cause suffering. Dismantling these oppressive structures affirms the value of every child by addressing the root causes threatening their existence and dignity. This shift invites participation in transformative justice, embodying compassion and recognizing the inherent sacredness of all lives. A proactive integration of belief with social action is essential for promoting equity and justice, vital for meaningful social change and a crucial expression of belief in action, transforming communities into spaces where all can thrive with dignity and hope. Acknowledging that societal structures create fear and pain that can obscure individual potential is crucial. Advocacy should move beyond solely focusing on abortion to address the systemic inequalities that perpetuate suffering. By dismantling these oppressive structures, we affirm the value of every child, committing to address the root causes that threaten their existence and dignity, rather than just reacting to the consequences of systemic failures.
This redirection encourages participation in transformative justice, reflecting a fundamental human desire for compassion. By doing so, we affirm the inherent value of every child and work towards a just society where every life has value no matter its time on earth.
Social work within organizations should be deeply rooted in an understanding of compassion, justice, and the inherent dignity of every individual. It is essential that we embrace intersectional frameworks to discern and address the systemic oppression that affects the marginalized within our communities. Merely critiquing the actions of those struggling for survival within these oppressive structures lacks the transformative power that our faith calls us to embody.
Challenging unjust systems and advocating for the marginalized are crucial for promoting equity and justice within our communities. We should strive to address the root causes of suffering and support those whose voices are often unheard. This proactive approach fosters meaningful social change and creates communities where all individuals can thrive with dignity and hope. Taking this proactive stance that integrates our values with social action allows us to promote equity and justice. This approach is crucial for meaningful social change and is a vital expression of our beliefs in action—transforming our communities into spaces where all individuals can thrive with dignity and hope.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--
REFERENCES (Proper ciations in the PDF version): Dennett, D. C. (2007). Breaking the spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. Penguin UK. Pg 285. Cadge, W., & Rambo, S. (2022). Chaplaincy and spiritual care in the Twenty-First century: An Introduction. UNC Press Books. pg Index of definitions. Fortress, A. (2009). Lutheran Study Bible (Hardcover). Sparkhouse Congregational. Matthew 7:12. NRSV John 13:34-35. Focus on the Family. (2023). What does the Bible say about abortion?. Communicate Jesus. (2023). How could a loving God command acts of violence as described in the Old Testament?. Footman, Katy. “Structural Stigmatisation of Abortion in the Health System: Perspectives of Abortion Care-Seekers, Providers, Managers, and Funders in England and Wales.” Social Science & Medicine (1982), vol. 365, 2025, pp. 117. Sawatsky, Alexander W. Anarchist Perspectives for Social Work: Disrupting Oppressive Systems. 1st ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.
